Showing posts with label History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 30, 2015

The last Christmas truce

A modified version of this post was published at The wire: 


It was December 1914. The rain had finally relented after days. The ground was mired in trenches flooded with water. There was continuous sniping, machine-gun fire and artillery shelling which had left a deathly trail of casualties behind.

“It was a Christmas card Christmas eve. There was white beautiful moonlight, frost on the ground – almost white everywhere. And round about – I should think – 7 or 8 in the evening we heard this singing and a lot of commotion and we saw some lights.”
“They finished their carol – we applauded them then we thought we must retaliate in some way so we replied with ‘The First Noel’.”
“So we went on…. Well, I thought this was rather an extraordinary thing really – to think of the two nations both singing the same carol in the middle of a war.”

Yes, this did happen. An unofficial ‘Christmas truce’ did happen in the middle of The First World War in December 1914. The first war of its kind was also marked by the last truce of its kind.

‘The Christmas Day Truce of 1914,’ a lithograph by Arthur C. Michael published on Jan. 9, 1915, shows British and German soldiers out of the trenches of World War I, arm in arm and exchanging headgear. ARTHUR C. MICHAEL/THE ILLUSTRATED LONDON NEWS PICTURE LIBRARY, LONDON, UK/BRIDGEMAN IMAGES

Declaration of the war

A hundred and one years ago, the world was unexpectedly plunged into the First World War. Europe was in the throes of great economic prosperity with a young German nation leading the way. In his very popular book at the time - The Great Illusion, Norman Angell had argued that war between industrial countries was futile and that economic interdependence between industrial countries meant that a war would be economically harmful to all countries involved. This was seen as a big deterrent to any possible threat of war. And yet, spurred by a complicated system of secret ententes and alliances, the allied countries – United Kingdom, France and Russia had gone to war against the Central powers of Germany and Austria-Hungary in July 1914 over the tragic assassination of Prince Archduke Franz Ferdinand and Princess Sophie of Austria-Hungary.

It was the first global confrontation of alliances that went beyond nations, and even continents, to involve the whole world through direct or indirect interests. The war had begun in the summer of 1914 and people were certain that the “troops will be home when the leaves fall”. Instead, what followed were four years of mass slaughter in deep, muddy trenches with barbed wires, battle tanks, explosives, aerial bombing, and chemical warfare that led to an entire generation of missing men.

Upon the declaration of war in July, a regimented and extra-ordinarily disciplined German advance had routed through Belgium despite stiff resistance and arrived at the gates of Paris only to be checked by the British Expeditionary Forces (BEF) at the last instant. After five months of industrial scale slaughter, the war came to a standstill on the western front in November 1914 with opposing armies staring at each other from across hastily built trenches that flanked the no-man’s land.

Life in the trenches

Life in trenches was no fun at any time of the year with the continuous dread of gunfire and shelling, flooding due to rains, and the poor hygienic conditions that arose from living in them amidst the wounded and the dead; but December was especially bad with its wet, frigid conditions. Early in December 1914, Pope Benedict XV had proposed an official “truce of god” that would cease fighting over the Christmas period but the very idea of a truce was rejected by the powers that be on both sides.

                              


Life in the trenches, Image from Chris Baker’s book: The Truce – the day the war stopped (http://www.1914-1918.net/truce.htm)





However, in order to maintain morale of the troops, throughout the month of December, 460,000 parcels and 2.5 million letters were sent to British soldiers in France. King George V in UK sent a card to every soldier and his daughter, Princess Mary, lent her name to a fund that sent a box of gifts (filled with chocolates, butterscotch, cigarettes, tobacco, her picture and a facsimile of George V’s greeting to the troops - ‘May God protect you and bring you safe home’) to all serving soldiers. The Germans at their end, sent tabletop Christmas trees (Tannenbaums), tobacco/cigars and festive wreaths for the soldiers to celebrate. Clear skies and a brief reprieve from the rain further lifted the spirits on both sides as a cold frost settled in, setting the stage for a white Christmas. It was in this context that the unprecedented ‘Christmas truce’ happened.

The truce

Many differing oral accounts, diary entries and letters suggest that the truce emerged spontaneously on the battlefields of the Western Front; and yet, despite these many accounts to this day no one knows exactly where it began or how it spread through the trenches. In all, about 100,000 people are believed to have participated in the spontaneous Christmas Truce of 1914.

On Christmas eve, candles and trees went up along parts of the German frontline. It is believed that they also delivered a chocolate cake to the British line accompanied by a note that proposed a ceasefire so that the Germans could have a concert. British officers at the frontline accepted the proposal and offered some tobacco as their present to the Germans. The goodwill soon spread along the 27-mile front line as carols echoed one after the other alternating between the German and British camps.





Encouraged by the events of the night before, on Christmas morning, German soldiers are believed to have emerged from their camps, calling out “Merry Christmas” in English. Frank Richards, a British soldier who experienced the “Christmas Truce” says, “On Christmas morning we stuck up a board with ‘A merry Christmas’ on it. The enemy has stuck up a similar one….. Two of our men then threw their equipment off and jumped on the parapet with their hands above their heads. Two of the Germans done the same and commenced to walk up the riverbank, our two men going to meet them. They met and shook hands and then we all got out of the trench. Buffalo Bill [the Company Commander] rushed into the trench and endeavored to prevent it, but he was too late: the whole of the Company were now out, and so were the Germans. He had to accept the situation, so soon he and the other company officers climbed out too. We and the Germans met in the middle of no-man's-land. Their officers was also now out. Our officers exchanged greetings with them.”

What began as general bonhomie and exchange of greetings led to the exchange of cigarettes, chocolates, cognac, rum, food, buttons and other wartime supplies. There are also reports of many small-scale football kick-abouts and other communal activities like pig-roasts. While the soldiers exchanged gifts and took photos spontaneously, it was also an opportunity for them to leave the squalid trenches and to tend to the wounded and dead in the No man’s land. The troops from both sides could also finally bury their dead comrades whose bodies had lain for weeks on end. In many places, the truce extended well into boxing day (the day after Christmas) and each side seemed to wait for the other to initiate firing. In fact, Murdoch M. Wood, a British soldier is reported to have said: “I then came to the conclusion that I have held firmly ever since, that if we had been left to ourselves there would never have been another shot fired.” It was however only a truce and hostilities eventually returned; in some places sooner than in others.

The truce was widespread but not universal as the firing is reported to have continued in many sectors like at Yser where bloody battles took place over Christmas. In fact, the French troops are reported to be puzzled and peeved by these reports of the British troops hobnobbing with their German enemies. Not surprisingly, young Adolf Hitler, then a Corporal of the 16th Bavarians, shared a similar opinion himself and said: “Such a thing should not happen in wartime. Have you no German sense of honor?”

The anger from the top

As reports of the truce reached the generals, the High Command was angry as it feared a mutiny due to fraternization with the enemy. Many commanders believed that this proximity and fraternization between the troops posed “the greatest danger” to the morale of soldiers and told divisional commanders to explicitly prohibit any “friendly intercourse with the enemy”. General Smith-Dorrien issued an instruction to commanders of all Divisions: "It is during this period that the greatest danger to the morale of troops exists. Experience of this and of every other war proves undoubtedly that troops in trenches in close proximity to the enemy slide very easily, if permitted to do so, into a "live and let live" theory of life...officers and men sink into a military lethargy from which it is difficult to arouse them when the moment for great sacrifices again arises...the attitude of our troops can be readily understood and to a certain extent commands sympathy...such an attitude is however most dangerous for it discourages initiative in commanders and destroys the offensive spirit in all ranks...the Corps Commander therefore directs Divisional Commanders to impress on subordinate commanders the absolute necessity of encouraging offensive spirit... friendly intercourse with the enemy, unofficial armistices, however tempting and amusing they may be, are absolutely prohibited". Strict orders were thus issued to end any such interactions between the troops along with harsh punishment for any man who refused to fight. And these policies ensured that such a widespread cessation of hostilities was never again seen in the war.


General Sir Horace Smith-Dorrien – commander of British 2nd Army Corps Expeditionary Force – issued strict warnings to his senior officers about preventing fraternization with enemy soldiers.
  
‘Live and let live’

The Christmas truce, however, was not unique as the massive violence of the war had indeed engendered an ethos of “live and let live” between warring troops. Infantries in close proximity would engage in friendly banter and barter of goods. In some areas, there was also an implicit agreement to not shoot at men while retrieving their dead/injured, while exercising or during meal times. Wagon trains delivering food behind enemy lines were easy targets for artillery but destroying the enemy’s food would elicit the same reaction from them; thus food wagons were mostly left unharmed. The same process made latrines safe zones. Such truces emerged repeatedly during the war and the ‘army top brass’ in the rear would intervene by rotating troops, threatening courts-martial and ordering savage raids that required hand-to-hand combat. There have also been other instances of occasional ceasefires between troops in the war but the Christmas truce of 1914 is unique for its sheer size, scale and spontaneity.

Even today, more than a century after the truce, it is remembered as a testament to the power of humanity and of the individual soldier on the frontlines. Its legend has been memorialized through books, movies and advertisements. To mark the centenary last year, Prince William unveiled a memorial with a metal frame representing a soccer ball with two hands clasped inside. The truce provided an unforgettable memory for many such as the British soldier who confessed in a letter the following day, “I wouldn’t have missed the experience of yesterday for the most gorgeous Christmas dinner in England.”

In the middle of an unexpectedly long and disastrous conflict, the truce symbolizes our desire for peace and our ability to effect change from the grassroots, no matter how fleeting. Instead of an organized, top-down ceasefire, the truce of 1914 was a spontaneous series of armistices that originated from the men in the trenches. Soldiers on the battlefront reclaimed the peace that was denied to them by their governments and generals as a matter of policy. As Alfred Anderson from the Fifth Battallion, the Black Watch later told: “It was a short peace in a terrible war.” But sometimes that is all that you need – a cessation of hostilities to see the enemy and his human side. It may not give you everything you want but it leaves a lasting impression for sure.

Sources:

Wednesday, December 31, 2014

The flutter of a butterfly…

The butterfly effect is a common trope in popular science and fiction that attempts to convey a hard-to-grasp scientific fact: a very small change in the initial conditions can create a significantly different outcome. The phrase refers to the idea that a butterfly's wings might create tiny changes in the atmosphere that may ultimately alter the path of tornado a large distance away. 

A small twist of fate can alter a lot for one person but I have always suspected the impact of  one event on the course of the entire world. Can one person, one event, one random turn, truly alter the course of history? Aren't we all just pieces in one gigantic puzzle linked together in a million tiny ways but unable to influence the picture as a whole. But then, once in a while, I encounter examples where one person does manage to alter the entire course of history - unintentionally perhaps, but irreversibly altered nevertheless. 

In many ways, the story below - laced with irony, rebellion, intrigue and love - symbolizes the Economist's law of unintended consequences. Ever since I first heard the story, I have been trying to reconcile the monumental impact of this one man, Gavrillo Princip and this one chance event on the world as it exists today. The thing that caught my attention in this story was not the action of men because they failed in their own ways. But it was the role of chance, randomness or luck that truly stood out for me. 

Gavrillo Princip (1894-1918), was a Bosnian Serb who was responsible for the assassination of Prince Archduke Ferdinand, heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary and his wife, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenburg. Princip was born in a family of serfs at a time when Serbia was in a tumultuous state of transition. 

In 1878, under the Treaty of Berlin, Austria-Hungary received the mandate to occupy and administer the Bosnia while the Ottoman empire retained official sovereignty. As part of the same treaty, Serbia was accorded the status of a sovereign state which soon transformed into a kingdom under Prince Obrenovic who ruled within the borders set by the treaty. However, this peaceful state of existence changed when as part of a military coup, the king and the queen of Serbia were violently murdered and Peter I was installed as the new king. This new dynasty was friendlier to Russia than to Austria-Hungary and over the next decade, disputes erupted as Serbia moved to reclaim its former fourteenth century empire. Serbia's military successes in these campaigns further emboldened the nationalistic elements in Serbia and the serbs in Austria-Hungary who were irked by the Austro-Hungarian rule. 

As a christian serb (serf) family living in northwestern Bosnia, the Princips (and other serbs) were often oppressed by their muslim landlords and forced to live off the little land they owned. This led to large scale discontent against the Austro-Hungrian empire. At the age of 13, Princip's brother moved him to Sarajevo and this gave him more opportunities for protest. In 1911, Princip joined the Young Bosnia, a society that wanted to separate Bosnia from Austria-Hungary and to unite it with the rising kingdom of Serbia. The following year, Princip was expelled from school for being involved in demonstrations against the Austro-Hungarian authorities. Coincidentally, after the Balkan wars in 1912-1913 the Austro-Hungarian administration in Bosnia and Herzegovina became extremely serbophobic and declared a state of emergency as the governor closed many schools and Serb societies and inflamed the historic anti-serb rhetoric. All this further fueled the young Princip and he left Sarajevo to arrive in Belgrade. He then volunteered to join Serbian Guerrilla bands fighting under the leadership of Major Vojin Tankosic, who was a member of the Black Hand - the leading terrorist organization in Serbia at the time. Three young men, including Gavrillo Princip at the age of 19, were thus trained, armed and tasked with the assassination of Prince archduke Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by Major Tankosic. These young men were a product of their times as they sought freedom from the Austro-Hungarain empire to unite with the serbs, in hope of a better future. 




Gavrillo Princip, PC: Wikipedia 

Franz Ferdinand's life too is a charming story in itself. He was born in Austria to the younger brother of the emperor Franz Joseph, Archduke Karl Ludwig and was thus not the direct heir to the throne. However, in 1889, his cousin, Crown Prince Rudolf committed suicide and this left emperor Franz Joseph's younger brother (and Franz Ferdinand's father) next in line to the throne. When his father, Archduke Karl Ludwig, died of typhoid fever in 1896, Franz Ferdinand became the prince and heir to the throne. 

            
Archduke Franz Ferdinand, PC: Wikipedia    Duchess Sophie, PC: Wikipedia 

As a young man, Franz Ferdinand had met Countess Sophie Chotek at a ball in Prague but was forbidden to marry her as she was not a member of one of the reigning dynasties of Europe. Sophie and Prince Franz stayed in touch through letters and their relationship blossomed, away from the eyes of the court. Deeply in love, Franz Ferdinand refused to marry anyone else and after numerous appeals from him and his royal friends (Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, German emperor Wilhelm II and Pope Leo XIII all appealed his case), emperor Franz Joseph finally permitted the prince to marry Sophie. He however imposed a condition that the marriage would be morganatic and that their children would have no succession rights to the throne. Sophie was further forbidden from sharing her husband's rank, title, precedence or privileges and could normally not appear in public with him. Despite these brutal restrictions, the two married in 1900 and stayed together for the rest of the lives (and even deaths).  

In 1913, in the midst of the crisis in Serbia, Emperor Franz Joseph commanded the archduke to observe military maneuvers that were scheduled for June 1914 in Bosnia.  June was also a time of great unrest in Serbia as it commemorates the 1389 Battle of Kosovo against the Ottomans when the Sultan was assassinated by a Serb. This was a time for serbian patriotism and military observances. Although, Duchess Sophie could never share the archduke's rank and splendors as the prince; she would not let him travel alone as she feared for his safety amidst all this turmoil. In fact, if you were to believe historian AJP Taylor, love was the reason they met their deaths on this fateful day in June - "[Sophie] could never share Franz Ferdinand's] rank… could never share his splendors, could never even sit by his side on any public occasion. There was one loophole… his wife could enjoy the recognition of his rank when he was acting in a military capacity. Hence, he decided in 1914, to inspect the army in Bosnia. There at its capital Sarajevo, the Archduke and his wife could ride in an open carriage side by side…Thus, for love, did the Archduke go to his death".

On the fateful morning of June 28, 1914, The Archduke and his wife arrived in Sarajevo by train and the entire motorcade including the governor of Sarajevo began its journey as per a pre-announced program. Six armed assassins including Princip were positioned along the motorcade route with a single target in mind - Austria's heir apparent, Archduke Franz Ferdinand. 

The first two assassins along the route failed to act but the third assassin, Nedeljko Cabrinovic, who was armed with a bomb decided to take action. He threw his bomb on the motorcade but unfortunately the bomb bounced off the convertible and exploded under the next car in the motorcade. This blast caused a major furore as 16-20 people were wounded. The assassin Cabrinovic swallowed his cyanide pill and jumped into the nearby river to evade the police. Unfortunately for him though, the river was running dry and only 6 inches deep and the cyanide pill did not quite work.  He was thus taken into custody and severely beaten. A disaster seemed to have been averted as the assassination attempt appeared to have been foiled. The motorcade sped away to arrive at the town hall for the scheduled reception where the Archduke (understandably) complained about the reception accorded to him - "Mr. Mayor, I come here on a visit and I get bombs thrown at me. It is outrageous." After a few soothing words from Sophie, he finally thanked the people of Sarajevo for their ovations "as I see in them an expression of their joy at the failure of the attempt at assassination." 


After the commotion of the explosion and the rally, Franz Ferdinand and Sophie gave up their planned program and decided to visit the wounded from the bombing at the nearby hospital. The remaining assassins had all dispersed to avoid capture and it seemed that the  plot was indeed foiled. 


Now, this is where fate makes an unlikely entry and alters the course of events. 


Once the Archduke and Duchess board the motorcade, the accompanying general orders that the royal car be  taken to the Hospital through a route that avoids the city center. However, the driver of this motorcade, Leopold Lojka did not get the order and took a wrong turn into the Franz Josef street which had a cafe. Fortuitously enough, after the failed assassination attempt, Gavrillo Princip had wandered to a nearby food shop - Schiller's Delicatessen on the same street. As the universe conspired, it was at this point that the Archduke's motorcade made the wrong turn. The driver, upon being told about the changed route was trying to reverse the car when the engine stalled and the gears locked giving Princip an unexpected opportunity. Taking the chance, Princip stepped forward and fired two shots from a distance of about 5 feet. The first bullet wounded the Archduke in the jugular and the second inflicted an abdominal wound on the Duchess (who some reports say was pregnant at this time). Both victims remained seated upright but died while being driven to the Governor's residence for medical treatment. As reported by Count Harrach who was with the motorcade, Franz Ferdinand's last words were "Sophie, Sophie! Don't die! Live for our children!" followed by six or seven utterances of "It's nothing" in response to questions about his pain. 




Princip and the other assassins were meanwhile caught and imprisoned for high treason. At his sentencing, Princip stated that his second shot was aimed at Governor Potiorek than the Duchess. Princip was 19 years old at the time of the assassinations and was thus too young to receive the death penalty. In fact, he was 27 days short of his twentieth birthday which would have made him eligible for death penalty under the Habsburg law. Instead, he received the maximum sentence of twenty years in prison where he contracted tuberculosis and died on 28 April 1918. Princip had stated under cross-examination: "I am a yugoslav nationalist and I believe in unification of all South Slavs in whatever form of state and that it be free of Austria." Princip, was a young terrorist who wished for nothing but the betterment of his people. 



Assassination illustrated in the Italian newspaper Domenica del Corriere, 12 July 1914 by Achille Beltrame. 


As fate conspired, this single event - the assassination of the Archduke, triggered a chain of events that resulted in the first world war within a month. Austria-Hungary blamed Serbia and dragged Germany into the war. Russia responded and France got involved leading finally to the entry of Great Britain. The war began one month after this assassination and continued for 4 years leading to one of the bloodiest wars in world history that spanned almost the entire world in one way or another. The first world war, of course, was directly responsible for the Second world war which ultimately shaped the world as it exists today. And so, one can extrapolate that the gun shot that was intended to start a local protest by killing the Archduke actually triggered a whole lot more than that. 

Ironically, Princip was saved from the death sentence by his young age but he only lived long enough to witness the horrors of the first world war and the millions of deaths that directly resulted from his actions. I cannot be certain but I am fairly sure that given the benefit of hindsight and knowing the consequences of his actions, Princip might have chosen to not fire his gun on that fateful day. Because if you extend the chains of causation - the current middle east crisis, the Israel-Palentinian conflict, the cold war, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Pearl Harbor, The third Reich, the treaty of Versailles, the first world war - they all occur at the other end of that one gunshot! 


I have long suspected the impact of individual agency on the course of world history because it often seems that our actions are often drowned by those of the multitudes around us, especially when it comes to changing the world. And yet, when I come across examples like this, I am forced to believe in the agency of one - for better or for worse. The agency of one, aided by the randomness and chaos that drives us is sometimes just as powerful as the flap of that butterfly's wings. 


Post-Script: 
My journey into understanding the first world war began through a podcast (Hardcore History by Dan Carlin) but it soon led me to dig deeper in books by John Keegan (The First World War) and Barbara Tuchman (The guns of August). This story has particularly captured my fascination even as I have dug-deeper and read more about it in wikipedia and other media outlets. 

Reference Sources: 
1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archduke_Franz_Ferdinand_of_Austria
2) G. J. Meyer (2007). A world undone: The story of the great war, Bantam Dell.
3) John Keegan (2000). The First World War.
4) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Archduke_Franz_Ferdinand_of_Austria
5) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavrilo_Princip
6) http://www.firstworldwar.com/bio/princip.htm
7) http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/27/gavrilo-princip-sarajevo-divided-archduke-franz-ferdinand-assassination
8) http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/27/guardian-1914-analysis-archduke-franz-ferdinand-shooting